E5B4 Properly validate parameterized mappings by Viicos · Pull Request #11658 · pydantic/pydantic · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Properly validate parameterized mappings #11658

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

Properly validate parameterized mappings #11658

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

Viicos
Copy link
Member
@Viicos Viicos commented Mar 31, 2025

Change Summary

Fixes #11650.

Regression in #11247, the logic was somehow tweaked when moved to the GenerateSchema class, so it was restored to how it was before.

Related issue number

Checklist

  • The pull request title is a good summary of the changes - it will be used in the changelog
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Tests pass on CI
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
  • My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

@github-actions github-actions bot added the relnotes-fix Used for bugfixes. label Mar 31, 2025
Copy link
cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Deploying pydantic-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: a071a50
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://36bb88bf.pydantic-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://mapping-regression.pydantic-docs.pages.dev

View logs

@Viicos Viicos added the backport-2.11 Needs backport to 2.11 label Mar 31, 2025
Copy link
codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 31, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #11658 will not alter performance

Comparing mapping-regression (a071a50) with main (dfa6c67)

Summary

✅ 46 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Contributor
github-actions bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.

Copy link
Contributor
@davidhewitt davidhewitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with one comment

Comment on lines 6957 to 6958
Note - we still don't do a good job of handling subclasses, as we convert the input to a dict
via the MappingValidator annotation's schema.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment now out of date?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch -- well the MappingValidator is not a thing anymore but I think the comment is still relevant.

@Viicos Viicos enabled auto-merge (squash) April 2, 2025 20:36
@Viicos Viicos merged commit 34095c7 into main Apr 2, 2025
60 checks passed
@Viicos Viicos deleted the mapping-regression branch April 2, 2025 20:48
Viicos added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-2.11 Needs backport to 2.11 relnotes-fix Used for bugfixes.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression 2.10: Not properly validating disjunction of dataclasses (or TypedDict) that embed Mapping
2 participants
0