-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Add generate_arguments_schema()
function
#11572
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Deploying pydantic-docs with
|
Latest commit: |
f2e7385
|
Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
Preview URL: | https://457e5e83.pydantic-docs.pages.dev |
Branch Preview URL: | https://generate-arguments-schema-fu.pydantic-docs.pages.dev |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #11572 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
51c0343
to
f036133
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good, needs tests etc.
Questions:
- do we want to mark this as experimental? I don't mind, just checking
- should we add
schema_type
as a kwarg tovalidate_call
?
I moved it to the experimental module.
We could, this shouldn't change anything as |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
8fbf1e6
to
29ca5dd
Compare
Coverage reportClick to see where and how coverage changed
This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action |
646d160
to
889faf3
Compare
889faf3
to
ac686db
Compare
42b20e6
to
4dc83b2
Compare
793a77e
to
4781d20
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please make the docs changes we've discussed, then lgtm
Change Summary
Example usage:
Related issue number
Checklist