Hi @jpaodev . Thanks a lot for all the work that went into this ❤️ . It's a bit difficult to review PRs that are that large and that mix different objectives, so let me split it up here:

1. Adding AWS bedrock keys: Sure, sounds useful. Would merge this immediately.
2. Adding Sonnet for AWS bedrock: Sure (but I really want to get away from all the hardcoded models and just switch to using Using LiteLLM to support more models #64 -- this would be a really useful thing to work on). Would merge this immediately
3. Adding open_pr to the web UI: Very nice :) Would merge immediately.
4. I'm less sure about the gitlab support, because we were trying to keep this as simple as possible (and github is just much more popular for most OSS). However, since you already worked on this to this extend, I'm open to consider it. However, this would at least need unittests that cover all the gitlab lines.

Could you perhaps open separate PRs for these 4 things? Also helps with bookkeeping in the changelog etc.

If it's too hard to separate 1.-3., creating one PR with 1.-3. would also be ok (but luckily it's mostly touching different files or you could alternatively work with git add -p). But let's look at 4. separately because it probably needs a bit more work.

Again, thanks a lot, much appreciated (I'd just recommend to open an issue for discussion before investing a lot of work in a PR in the future -- just to avoid situations where maintainers have to reject)