8000 chore: 📢 Bump version to 1.21.0 by podman-desktop-bot · Pull Request #13080 · podman-desktop/podman-desktop · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

podman-desktop-bot
Copy link
Contributor

📢 Bump version to 1.21.0

1.20.0 has been released.

Time to switch to the new 1.21.0 version 🥳

Signed-off-by: vzhukovs <fbenoit@redhat.com>
@podman-desktop-bot podman-desktop-bot requested review from benoitf and a team as code owners July 7, 2025 13:56
@podman-desktop-bot podman-desktop-bot requested review from dgolovin and SoniaSandler and removed request for a team July 7, 2025 13:56
@podman-desktop-bot podman-desktop-bot enabled auto-merge (rebase) July 7, 2025 13:56
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2025
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes include updating the version numbers from "1.20.0-next" to "1.21.0-next" in the root package.json and in the package.json files for multiple extensions, including Compose, Docker, kind, kube-context, kubectl-cli, Lima, Podman, and registries. Additionally, a new release entry for version 1.20.0 dated 2025-07-07 was added to .flatpak-appdata.xml. The bug report issue template was also updated to reorder the dropdown options for the "Version" field, moving "1.20.0" after "1.19.2" and "1.19.1" after "next (development version)".

Suggested reviewers

  • dgolovin

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
extensions/docker/package.json (1)

5-5: Same version-bump comment applies

Covered by the root-level verification script.

extensions/kind/package.json (1)

5-5: Same version-bump comment applies

Covered by the root-level verification script.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml (1)

54-57: Consider pre-adding “1.21.0” to the list
After this release goes GA, users on 1.21.0 will have to choose “next (development version)” until the template is updated again. Adding the soon-to-be current version now would save a follow-up PR.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between af65f36 and 68a25d2.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .flatpak-appdata.xml (1 hunks)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml (1 hunks)
  • extensions/compose/package.json (1 hunks)
  • extensions/docker/package.json (1 hunks)
  • extensions/kind/package.json (1 hunks)
  • extensions/kube-context/package.json (1 hunks)
  • extensions/kubectl-cli/package.json (1 hunks)
  • extensions/lima/package.json (1 hunks)
  • extensions/podman/packages/extension/package.json (1 hunks)
  • extensions/registries/package.json (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: benoitf
PR: podman-desktop/podman-desktop#13043
File: packages/main/src/plugin/color-registry-inject.spec.ts:33-35
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T08:26:44.169Z
Learning: In test files for Podman Desktop, benoitf prefers partial mocking over complete mocking. Partial mocks that only implement the methods actually used in the test are sufficient and preferred over creating complete mock objects.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (12)
  • GitHub Check: unit tests / windows-2022
  • GitHub Check: unit tests / ubuntu-24.04
  • GitHub Check: unit tests / macos-15
  • GitHub Check: smoke e2e tests (production)
  • GitHub Check: smoke e2e tests (development)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck
  • GitHub Check: linter, formatters
  • GitHub Check: Linux
  • GitHub Check: macOS
  • GitHub Check: Windows
  • GitHub Check: build website
  • GitHub Check: take screenshots
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.flatpak-appdata.xml (1)

112-114: Release entry correctly added

The new 1.20.0 release is inserted in descending order, date format matches existing entries, and schema consistency is preserved.

extensions/registries/package.json (1)

5-5: Version bump detected – mirrors root package.json

No other changes; looks good.

extensions/kubectl-cli/package.json (1)

5-5: Version bump looks correct and consistent
No additional issues spotted; matches the overall 1.21.0-next bump across the repo.

extensions/lima/package.json (1)

5-5: Version updated successfully
Change is purely semantic; nothing else to verify here.

extensions/kube-context/package.json (1)

5-5: LGTM – aligned with global version
No functional impact.

extensions/podman/packages/extension/package.json (1)

5-5: Podman extension version bump acknowledged
Everything else in the manifest remains untouched; good to go.

extensions/compose/package.json (1)

5-5: Version bump looks good

"version": "1.21.0-next" correctly aligns this extension with the new release cycle.

"repository": "https://github.com/podman-desktop/podman-desktop",
"homepage": "https://www.podman-desktop.io",
"version": "1.20.0-next",
"version": "1.21.0-next",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify that every package.json now carries 1.21.0-next

The root version is bumped, but it’s easy to miss one of the many extension package.json files in the workspace.
Run the script below to confirm all packages are in lock-step:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Fails if any package.json (outside node_modules) has a version other than 1.21.0-next
set -e
expected="1.21.0-next"
fd package.json -E node_modules | while read -r file; do
  v=$(jq -r '.version // empty' "$file")
  [[ -n "$v" && "$v" != "$expected" ]] && { echo "Version mismatch in $file: $v"; exit 1; }
done
echo "✅   All package.json files are at $expected"

Length of output: 1348


Version mismatch detected – sync all package.json versions
The version-check script reported a discrepancy:

• extensions/podman/packages/api/package.json: version is 0.0.1 (expected 1.21.0-next)

Please update that file’s "version" field to "1.21.0-next" so all packages remain in lock-step.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json at line 6, the version field is set to "1.21.0-next" but
extensions/podman/packages/api/package.json has a mismatched version "0.0.1".
Update the "version" field in extensions/podman/packages/api/package.json to
"1.21.0-next" to ensure all package versions are consistent.

@podman-desktop-bot podman-desktop-bot merged commit a580645 into main Jul 7, 2025
23 checks passed
@podman-desktop-bot podman-desktop-bot deleted the bump-to-1.21.0 branch July 7, 2025 14:24
@podman-desktop-bot podman-desktop-bot added this to the 1.21.0 milestone Jul 7, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 14, 2025
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0