-
It has been proposed recently on theoretical grounds that results published in "Judgment and Decision Making" are better replicable than results published in other psychology journals.
-
To test this hypothesis empirically, master and bachelor students writing their final thesis in the division of cognitive psychology (head Dr Susann Fiedler and Dr Andreas Glöckner) at the FernUniversität in Hagen will systematically replicate studies published in "Judgment and Decision Making".
-
The "Hagen Cumulative Science Project I" thereby supports the current debate on the replicability of research in psychology and introduces future generations of researchers to the method of replication.
-
The following ShinyApp (based on R) is a template for visualizing the results of the paper. The data used in this template is fictitious and therefore invalid for inferring the paper's results. The researchers are encouraged to use the following template (app) for their result presentation. To use it, please fork the repository and use your google docs link in url <- "google docs link".
-
In the DataTable the gathered replication dataset is presented with the links to the original papers along with the other information about the replicated study.
-
The latter 3 plots at tabPanels illustrate the confidence intervals of the original studies, replication studies and simultaneous representation of both values respectively.
-
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at the email/LinkedIn provided here.
- Glöckner, Andreas, Marc Jekel, Ramona Allstadt Torras, Angela R Dorrough, Christine Anderl, Nicole Franke, Dorothee Mischkowski, Susann Fiedler, Stefanie Miketta, and Janik Goltermann. 2018. “Hagen Cumulative Science Project I.” OSF. November 18. osf.io/d7za8.