OK

pandas-dev · jreback · Nov 14, 2019 · Aug 9, 2019 · Aug 9, 2019 · Aug 9, 2019
commit d19282d084b34066e19fc1eb47d906ce4c5b62fe
diff --git a/pandas/core/indexes/base.py b/pandas/core/indexes/base.py
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ def cmp_method(self, other):
             if other.ndim > 0 and len(self) != len(other):
                 raise ValueError("Lengths must match to compare")
 
-        if is_object_dtype(self):  # and not isinstance(self, ABCMultiIndex):
-            # don't pass MultiIndex
+        if is_object_dtype(self):
             assert not isinstance(self, ABCMultiIndex)
             with np.errstate(all="ignore"):
                 result = ops._comp_method_OBJECT_ARRAY(op, self.values, other)
@@ -120,6 +119,7 @@ def cmp_method(self, other):
         if is_bool_dtype(result):
             # TODO: This fails for exactly 1 test, with Int64Index and other="a" and ==
             return result
+        #raise RuntimeError(other, op, self.dtype)
         try:
             return Index(result)
         except TypeError:
@@ -5376,16 +5376,6 @@ def _maybe_update_attributes(self, attrs):
         """
         return attrs
 
-    def _validate_for_numeric_unaryop(self, op, opstr):
-        """
-        Validate if we can perform a numeric unary operation.
-        """
-        if not self._is_numeric_dtype:
-            raise TypeError(
-                "cannot evaluate a numeric op "
-                "{opstr} for type: {typ}".format(opstr=opstr, typ=type(self).__name__)
-            )
-
     @classmethod
     def _add_numeric_methods_binary(cls):
         """
@@ -5417,8 +5407,6 @@ def _add_numeric_methods_unary(cls):
 
         def _make_evaluate_unary(op, opstr):
             def _evaluate_numeric_unary(self):
-
-                # self._validate_for_numeric_unaryop(op, opstr)
                 attrs = self._get_attributes_dict()
                 attrs = self._maybe_update_attributes(attrs)
                 return Index(op(self.values), **attrs)