DOC: Improved the docstring of pandas.DataFrame.values #20065
DOC: Improved the docstring of pandas.DataFrame.values
replaced NDFrame by DataFrame
- Loading branch information
commit 41a26910900e9651f79db82c1fc3a1b7b55afc85
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -4241,7 +4241,7 @@ def values(self): | |
| Returns | ||
| ------- | ||
| numpy.ndarray | ||
| The values of the DataFrame | ||
|
|
||
| Examples | ||
| -------- | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
from_arraycould be a good option for aSee Alsosection. If I'm not wrong it's kind of the inverse method.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went with
from_records, thank you for suggesting to include the inverse in that section.