Feat/ollama #538
Merged
Feat/ollama #538
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Replace OpenAI-specific env vars with `OLLAMA_URL` and `OLLAMA_MODEL` in `.env.example` - Update `config/copilot.yaml` to use the Ollama provider and default model (`gpt-oss:20b`) - Pass Ollama settings through Docker Compose and add `host.docker.internal` mapping so the UI can reach a host-running Ollama instance - Update UI Dockerfile docs to reflect Ollama runtime configuration, enabling local model usage without an OpenAI API key
Reformatted chat route and assistant components to satisfy lint/Prettier rules, including trailing commas, consistent wrapping, and JSX layout changes without functional impact.
|
Claude finished @orangekame3's task —— View job Code Review for PR #538: Feat/ollamaOverviewThis PR successfully migrates from CopilotKit to a custom Ollama-based chat implementation. The changes are well-structured and follow good architectural patterns. Below is my comprehensive review: ✅ StrengthsClean Architecture
Security Considerations
Code Quality
|
- Register getChipList, getChipMetricsData, and getMetricsConfiguration tools so the assistant can fetch and analyze chip metrics autonomously. - Update the default system prompt with guidance for evaluating/analyzing metrics (defaulting to latest chip and 7 days of data) to improve responses. - Ensure isRunning is cleared before appending assistant/tool messages to prevent duplicate AI/loading indicators in the chat UI.
|
Claude Code is working… I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
- Add `language` setting and Japanese `initial_message` to Copilot config - Introduce configurable suggestion buttons that append preset prompts into the chat thread - Replace markdown-based empty-state prompt list with a clearer, guided onboarding UI
|
Claude finished @orangekame3's task —— View job Code Review for PR #538: Feat/ollamaComprehensive review of the migration from CopilotKit to Ollama-based chat implementation. Todo List:
🚨 Critical Security IssueContext Injection Vulnerability - if (context) {
systemMessage += `\n\nCurrent context:\n${JSON.stringify(context, null, 2)}`;
}
🔧 Implementation IssuesMemory Management Problem
const handleClear = () => {
window.location.reload(); // Heavy-handed approach
};
Error Handling Gaps
⚡ Performance Concerns
🧪 Test Coverage Critical GapNo tests found for the new chat functionality:
🔍 Code Quality IssuesMissing Input Validation
Architecture Concerns
✅ Positive Aspects
📋 Recommendations🔴 Must Fix Before Merge
🟡 Should Fix Soon
🟢 Future Improvements
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid architectural migration with good separation of concerns, but the critical security vulnerability with context injection must be addressed before merging. The lack of test coverage is also concerning for production deployment. Recommendation: Fix security issue and add basic tests, then this will be ready for merge. |
Add a `language` field (default `en`) and a typed `Suggestion` model with a `suggestions` list to support localized, structured prompt suggestions in the chat UI.
|
Claude finished @orangekame3's task —— View job Code Review for PR #538: Feat/ollamaComprehensive review of the migration from CopilotKit to Ollama-based chat implementation. Todo List:
🚨 Critical Security IssueContext Injection Vulnerability - if (context) {
systemMessage += `\n\nCurrent context:\n${JSON.stringify(context, null, 2)}`;
}
🔧 Implementation IssuesMemory Management Problem
const handleClear = () => {
window.location.reload(); // Heavy-handed approach
};
Error Handling Gaps
⚡ Performance Concerns
🧪 Test Coverage Critical GapNo tests found for the new chat functionality:
🔍 Code Quality IssuesMissing Input Validation
Architecture Concerns
✅ Positive Aspects
📋 Recommendations🔴 Must Fix Before Merge
🟡 Should Fix Soon
🟢 Future Improvements
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid architectural migration with good separation of concerns, but the critical security vulnerability with context injection must be addressed before merging. The lack of test coverage is also concerning for production deployment. Recommendation: Fix security issue and add basic tests, then this will be ready for merge. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reformatted chat route and assistant components to satisfy lint/Prettier rules, including trailing commas, consistent wrapping, and JSX layout changes without functional impact.