8000 [CTL] Add size check for umfCtlExec by KFilipek · Pull Request #1363 · oneapi-src/unified-memory-framework · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[CTL] Add size check for umfCtlExec #1363

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2025

Conversation

KFilipek
Copy link
Contributor
@KFilipek KFilipek commented Jun 10, 2025

Description

As stated in the title.

Checklist

  • Code compiles without errors locally
  • All tests pass locally
  • CI workflows execute properly
  • CI workflows, not executed per PR (e.g. Nightly), execute properly
  • New tests added, especially if they will fail without my changes
  • Added/extended example(s) to cover this functionality
  • Extended the README/documentation
  • All newly added source files have a license
  • All newly added source files are referenced in CMake files
  • Logger (with debug/info/... messages) is used
  • All API changes are reflected in docs and def/map files, and are tested

@KFilipek KFilipek self-assigned this Jun 10, 2025
@KFilipek KFilipek requested a review from a team as a code owner June 10, 2025 08:35
@KFilipek KFilipek force-pushed the umfctlexec-size-check branch 2 times, most recently from 4f94df9 to c99d672 Compare June 10, 2025 09:11
@KFilipek KFilipek force-pushed the umfctlexec-size-check branch from c99d672 to 63ba5f9 Compare June 10, 2025 09:18
@KFilipek KFilipek force-pushed the umfctlexec-size-check branch from 63ba5f9 to cff9694 Compare June 10, 2025 12:23
@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk merged commit 5d702f6 into oneapi-src:main Jun 11, 2025
88 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0