8000 docs: add `status` type for `useAsyncData` by TheAlexLichter Β· Pull Request #22511 Β· nuxt/nuxt Β· GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

docs: add status type for useAsyncData #22511

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 7, 2023
Merged

docs: add status type for useAsyncData #22511

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 7, 2023

Conversation

TheAlexLichter
Copy link
Member

❓ Type of change

  • πŸ“– Documentation (updates to the documentation, readme or JSdoc annotations)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

Add missing status type to docs.

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@nuxt-studio
Copy link
Contributor
nuxt-studio bot commented Aug 6, 2023

βœ… Live Preview ready!

Name Edit Preview Latest Commit
Nuxt Docs Edit on Studio β†—οΈŽ View Live Preview d7f7f6f

@TheAlexLichter TheAlexLichter changed the title docs(useFetch): add status type docs(nuxt): add status type Aug 6, 2023
@danielroe danielroe changed the title docs(nuxt): add status type docs: add status type for useAsyncData Aug 7, 2023
@danielroe danielroe merged commit ed915ed into main Aug 7, 2023
@danielroe danielroe deleted the manniL-patch-1 branch August 7, 2023 06:50
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0