Alternative to #9332 #9776
Closed
Alternative to #9332 #9776
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The str of 0d arrays now returns `str(a[()])` like scalars, and the
repr returns `'array(' + formatter(a[()]) + ')'` like ndarrays.
The default implementation of str and repr for user-defined types is
removed. Fixes numpy#1415
ad9b750 to
0a2244d
Compare
|
Actually, this is so similar to #9201 that I'm gonna go ahead and update that one |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One extra commit on top of #9332, that protects
str(0darr)againstnp.set_string_function, and leaves thestyleargument deprecated.