-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11k
BUG: Fix broken pickle in MaskedArray when dtype is object (Return list instead of string when dtype is object) #8122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6b0d1e3
TST add test to check pickling of object dtyped masked array
raghavrv 3669bfa
Serialize to list instead of bytestring for the data array
raghavrv 2ed5002
Test for different masks
raghavrv 66993e0
Test fill value for object dtype too
raghavrv 1fa49f8
Use ndarray.__reduce__ to extract the bytestring/list
raghavrv File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -476,13 +476,24 @@ def test_str_repr(self): | |
|
||
def test_pickling(self): | ||
# Tests pickling | ||
a = arange(10) | ||
a[::3] = masked | ||
a.fill_value = 999 | ||
a_pickled = pickle.loads(a.dumps()) | ||
assert_equal(a_pickled._mask, a._mask) | ||
assert_equal(a_pickled._data, a._data) | ||
assert_equal(a_pickled.fill_value, 999) | ||
for dtype in (int, float, str, object): | ||
a = arange(10).astype(dtype) | ||
a.fill_value = 999 | ||
|
||
masks = ([0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1], # partially masked | ||
True, # Fully masked | ||
False) # Fully unmasked | ||
|
||
for mask in masks: | ||
a.mask = mask | ||
a_pickled = pickle.loads(a.dumps()) | ||
assert_equal(a_pickled._mask, a._mask) | ||
assert_equal(a_pickled._data, a._data) | ||
if dtype in (object, int): | ||
assert_equal(a_pickled.fill_value, 999) | ||
else: | ||
assert_equal(a_pickled.fill_value, dtype(999)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. is there a reason not to test this for object? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for the catch... I missed an else here :( Fixed it in the recent commit... |
||
assert_array_equal(a_pickled.mask, mask) | ||
|
||
def test_pickling_subbaseclass(self): | ||
# Test pickling w/ a subclass of ndarray | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@shoyer, does this really make more sense given that we're making assumptions about
super.__reduce__
's return value, and discarding all elements but one?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm pretty comfortable with this, given that (1) the spec of
__reduce__
is mostly prescribed by Python and this MaskedArray is defined in NumPy itself, which means that if any ever changes howndarray.__reduce__
works our unit tests will catch the issue for MaskedArray.