8000 DOC: remove preservena reference from docstrings by juliantaylor · Pull Request #5107 · numpy/numpy · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

DOC: remove preservena reference from docstrings #5107

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2014

Conversation

juliantaylor
Copy link
Contributor

preservena is not not implemented.
the putmask is be misleading, currently copyto is faster for dense or
sparse masks while putmask is faster for random masks.
[ci skip]

preservena is not not implemented.
the putmask docstring is misleading, currently copyto is faster for
dense or sparse masks while putmask is faster for random masks.
[ci skip]
@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Sep 23, 2014

There are other scattered references to NA, they did not all get cleaned out. Is this change safe or should we deprecate the keyword first?

@juliantaylor
Copy link
Contributor Author

its just in the docstring, the function doesn't accept it

charris added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2014
DOC: remove preservena reference from docstrings
@charris charris merged commit d7fd1e8 into numpy:master Sep 23, 2014
@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Sep 23, 2014

Merging before travis, only changes documentation. Thanks Julian.

@juliantaylor
Copy link
Contributor Author

you would have waited forever I have set the [ci skip] flag :)

juliantaylor added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2014
DOC: remove preservena reference from docstrings
@juliantaylor juliantaylor deleted the na-doc branch September 23, 2014 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0