8000 numpy.i bugfix: fortran ordering check by jspreston · Pull Request #4334 · numpy/numpy · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

numpy.i bugfix: fortran ordering check #4334

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2014
Merged

Conversation

jspreston
Copy link
Contributor

for ARGOUTVIEWM?_FARRAY[34] typemaps, the included require_fortran check was inverted -- failing if the resulting array had fortran ordering, not if it did not. This modification inverts these checks.

for ARGOUTVIEWM?_FARRAY[34] typemaps, the included require_fortran check was inverted -- failing if the resulting array had fortran ordering, not if it did not.  This modification inverts these checks.
@jspreston
Copy link
Contributor Author

this addresses issue #403, @charris

@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Feb 20, 2014

@wfspotz Could you take a look at this?

@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Mar 5, 2014

@wfspotz I'd like to merge this but need an OK from you first.

@wfspotz
Copy link
Contributor
wfspotz commented Mar 5, 2014

This looks good to me. Do you need any other action on my part?

@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Mar 5, 2014

@wfspotz Nope, thanks for taking a look.

charris added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2014
numpy.i bugfix: fortran ordering check
@charris charris merged commit 0bf8fec into numpy:master Mar 5, 2014
@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Mar 5, 2014

@jspreston Merged, thanks.

@charris charris mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2014
@jspreston jspreston deleted the patch-1 branch March 7, 2014 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0