BUG: Fix segfault in stringdtype lexsort #27993
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* BUG: do not assume REFCHK is the same as object in lexsort * TST: add tests for stringdtype argsort * TST: add tests for string lexsort
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #27992.
Fixes #27984
The segfault was happening because REFCHK is not a sufficient condition anymore (if it ever was) to assume the GIL is held. The fix is to use the check that was already happening to see if the dtype has NEEDS_PYAPI set.
Also adds tests for both stringdtype argsort and string lexsort.
BUG: do not assume REFCHK is the same as object in lexsort
TST: add tests for stringdtype argsort
TST: add tests for string lexsort