8000 ENH: add type stubs from numpy-stubs by person142 · Pull Request #16515 · numpy/numpy · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

ENH: add type stubs from numpy-stubs #16515

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 9, 2020
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions doc/release/upcoming_changes/16515.improvement.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
NumPy is now typed
------------------
Type annotations have been added for large parts of NumPy. There is
also a new `numpy.typing` module that contains useful types for
end-users. The currently available types are

- ``ArrayLike``: for objects that can be coerced to an array
- ``DtypeLike``: for objects that can be coerced to a dtype
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@person142, sorry for being late to the party. Should we make this DTypeLike with a capital T? I have been using DType for the dtype classes (I guess as a short form of the camel-case DataType. I am happy to use this one as well, would be good to keep it in sync).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is, unless this actually includes concrete instances, such as strings of specific length. In that case it may actually be better to use different spellings. I would have to review the discussion on that...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm @seberg could you open an issue? I think “DtypeLike” was originally “things that can be passed into np.dtype“, and with the dtype changes we should think carefully about what makes sense...

Loading
0