-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.9k
ENH: add type stubs from numpy-stubs #16515
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
11b95d1
ENH: add type stubs from numpy-stubs
person142 3fee17a
MAINT: move typing tests cases into a subdirectory of numpy/tests
person142 744512d
MAINT: merge typing requirements into test requirements
person142 8362a36
MAINT: modify mypy error line parsing to work on windows
person142 7c0d99d
DOC: Add a release note about types being added
person142 f09b27d
MAINT: avoid divide by zero in typing test causing aarch64 tests to fail
person142 4b5f00e
MAINT: only run typing tests on python > 3.6 and < 3.9
person142 2e238e4
MAINT: avoid more division by zero in typing test causing aarch64 to …
person142 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
NumPy is now typed | ||
------------------ | ||
Type annotations have been added for large parts of NumPy. There is | ||
also a new `numpy.typing` module that contains useful types for | ||
end-users. The currently available types are | ||
|
||
- ``ArrayLike``: for objects that can be coerced to an array | ||
- ``DtypeLike``: for objects that can be coerced to a dtype | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@person142, sorry for being late to the party. Should we make this DTypeLike with a capital T? I have been using DType for the dtype classes (I guess as a short form of the camel-case DataType. I am happy to use this one as well, would be good to keep it in sync).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is, unless this actually includes concrete instances, such as strings of specific length. In that case it may actually be better to use different spellings. I would have to review the discussion on that...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm @seberg could you open an issue? I think “DtypeLike” was originally “things that can be passed into
np.dtype
“, and with the dtype changes we should think carefully about what makes sense...