8000 use openlibm · Issue #7173 · numpy/numpy · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

use openlibm #7173

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
argriffing opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

use openlibm #7173

argriffing opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
01 - Enhancement 57 - Close? Issues which may be closable unless discussion continued component: build

Comments

@argriffing
Copy link
Contributor

Numpy has hacks to work around bad/missing/old platform math library implementations. It has been mentioned a few times that the compatibly-licensed openlibm could be used instead, so I'm opening a separate github issue for that idea.
@argriffing
Copy link
Contributor Author

see also https://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2016-February/074856.html

@njsmith njsmith mentioned this issue Mar 19, 2016
Closed
@matthew-brett matthew-brett mentioned this issue Feb 6, 2017
Closed
8000
@mattip mattip added 01 - Enhancement 57 - Close? Issues which may be closable unless discussion continued component: build labels Oct 9, 2018
@mattip
Copy link
Member
mattip commented Oct 9, 2018

I think we can close this. Even musl has enough C99 math that precludes the need for openlibm

@charris charris closed this as completed Oct 9, 2018
@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Oct 9, 2018

Looks like this problem will solve itself over time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
01 - Enhancement 57 - Close? Issues which may be closable unless discussion continued component: build
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@charris @argriffing @mattip
0