8000 WIP: Authorization spec fast-follow by localden · Pull Request #401 · modelcontextprotocol/modelcontextprotocol · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

WIP: Authorization spec fast-follow #401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025
Merged

WIP: Authorization spec fast-follow #401

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

localden
Copy link
Contributor

Following-up on #338 with minor clarifications.

Co-authored-by: David Soria Parra <167242713+dsp-ant@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -82,14 +82,18 @@ authorization servers to MCP clients, as well as the discovery process through w
clients can determine authorization server endpoints and supported capabilities.

### 2.3.1 Authorization Server Location

MCP servers **MUST** implement OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata ([RFC9728](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9728))
specification to indicate the locations of authorization servers. The Protected Resource Metadata document returned by the MCP server **MUST** include
the `authorization_servers` field containing at least one authorization server.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we recommend that there is only one listed for simplicity sake?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that makes sense. I will tweak the verbiage.

@localden localden merged commit 99477d6 into main Apr 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@localden localden deleted the localden/auth branch April 24, 2025 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0