8000 [rush] By default, truncate long lists of package names when running rush check. by iclanton · Pull Request #3315 · microsoft/rushstack · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[rush] By default, truncate long lists of package names when running rush check. #3315

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 6, 2022
Merged

[rush] By default, truncate long lists of package names when running rush check. #3315

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 6, 2022

Conversation

iclanton
Copy link
Member
@iclanton iclanton commented Apr 5, 2022

Summary

Right now, in large repos, rush check may print a very long list of package names if a mismatching dependency version exists for a dependency listed by many projects.

This change updates that to something that looks like:

Starting "rush check"

@rushstack/heft
  0.44.4
   - preferred versions from common-versions.json
   - projectA
   - projectB
   - projectC
   - projectD
   (and 623 others)
  0.44.3
   - @msstream/components-web-video

This behavior can be suppressed with a new --verbose flag passed to rush check. It cannot be suppressed when running rush install or rush update.

How it was tested

Tested by changing the version of @rushstack/heft for one project in a large repo.

D4N14L
D4N14L approved these changes Apr 5, 2022
View reviewed changes
octogonz
octogonz reviewed Apr 5, 2022
View reviewed changes
@iclanton iclanton enabled auto-merge April 6, 2022 05:14
@iclanton iclanton merged commit 9635919 into microsoft:master Apr 6, 2022
@iclanton iclanton deleted the rush-check-summary branch April 6, 2022 05:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@octogonz octogonz octogonz left review comments

@dmichon-msft dmichon-msft dmichon-msft left review comments

@D4N14L D4N14L D4N14L approved these changes

@apostolisms apostolisms Awaiting requested review from apostolisms

@sachinjoseph sachinjoseph Awaiting requested review from sachinjoseph

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@iclanton @D4N14L @octogonz @dmichon-msft
0