-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
Feature parity with C# and JS #148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ilder-python into work-in-progress
* add docstring with google/pytorch style * add initial test with unittest
* update ChoiceFactory etc. * update casing for Channels, and others.
* prebuilt entity with multiple values * list entity with single value * list entity with multiple values
* test for multiple datetime entities * test for v1 datetime resolution
…ilder-python into work-in-progress
* add user agent * add test for user agent
* add connection timeout * add test for connection timeout
…ilder-python into work-in-progress
and update tests
…ilder-python into work-in-progress Merge.
@daveta, @congysu, @axelsrz, @Zerryth Why is everyone working on the same branch and touching different libraries? Reviewers who like to use Code Flow cannot use the tool to review this PR due to the number of commits. Please consider getting this PR in ASAP and then quickly iterating with separate PRs. Otherwise this PR is going to be close to impossible to review. |
@stevengum I have a sneaking suspicion the reason is "b/c Ashley messed up with git/github at some point >_>" |
@stevengum @Zerryth Actually what happened is that I was using this branch 3 weeks ago to push the general template for the new classes and my guess is that because a lot of breaking code was pushed in a small amount of time, this branch was used as quick push. We should start to at least make PRs against this branch (work-in-progress). I'm almost done with building the fix so we can do that from now on. |
working on: