-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Add mplcursors to third-party packages. #7242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
mplcursors | ||
========== | ||
|
||
`mplcursors <https://github.com/anntzer/mplcursors>` provides interactive |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The trailing underscores are missing to turn this into a link. Also, why not link to RTD instead of GitHub?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the suggestion, fixed.
mplcursors | ||
========== | ||
|
||
`mplcursors <https://mplcursors.readthedocs.io>_` provides interactive |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The underscore goes outside the backtick.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed again.
Self-plug :-)
@anntzer Do you want to merge this as-is or wait for feedback from @joferkington ? |
Looks good to me! Greek free to merge the sections as well, it you'd like. Also, my apologies for being so out of the loop on things x lately. |
DOC: Add mplcursors to third-party packages. Conflicts: doc/thirdpartypackages/index.rst This was moved from mpl_toolkits between these branches
backported to v1.5.3-doc as d134631 |
Self-plug :-)
@joferkington I would like to add a paragraph comparing the approaches of mpldatacursor and mplcursors, but I'd like to make sure that you agree with it. My feeling that mpldatacursor tries to provide as many customizations to the annotation as possible as kwargs in the call to
datacursor()
, whereas I tried to makemplcursors
as minimal as possible, by letting instead the user hook into annotation-adding or removing events to customize the annotation as he sees fit.If we can agree on a comparison, then perhaps the two sections can be merged together, too.