8000 Remove suggestion to remove rk4/rk45 integrators from streamplot. by anntzer · Pull Request #19620 · matplotlib/matplotlib · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Remove suggestion to remove rk4/rk45 integrators from streamplot. #19620

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2021
Merged

Remove suggestion to remove rk4/rk45 integrators from streamplot. #19620

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2021

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor
@anntzer anntzer commented Mar 2, 2021

They have already been removed in d60c9fc.

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has pytest style unit tests (and pytest passes).
  • Is Flake 8 compliant (run flake8 on changed files to check).
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related.
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant (the docs should build without error).
  • Conforms to Matplotlib style conventions (install flake8-docstrings and run flake8 --docstring-convention=all).
  • New features have an entry in doc/users/next_whats_new/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).
  • API changes documented in doc/api/next_api_changes/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).

@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the v3.5.0 milestone Mar 2, 2021
@QuLogic QuLogic merged commit 3a5fc0f into matplotlib:master Mar 2, 2021
@anntzer anntzer deleted the rk4 branch March 3, 2021 01:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@QuLogic QuLogic QuLogic approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Documentation Maintenance
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v3.5.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@anntzer @QuLogic
0