Add ridge_map to third party packages documentation #14119
Conversation
|
If you run optipng on it (no specific optimization level), you can save 40%. Also, cropping the outer white border might help a little (though perhaps not as much after optimization.) |
|
Thats a pretty cool package. 👍 for putting it on the list. |
|
Thanks for advice -- you were eerily correct on how much space it saved! |
|
you'll want to squash the first commit too, so that the old version doesn't stay in the git history. |
|
We can squash merge it, and I might push an even smaller image too. Can you make a release on PyPI too? |
|
I shrunk it down some more by simply re-creating it closer to the size it would end up being on the page (364 ~= 400 px, anyway.) |
|
That'll look pretty fuzzy on high-dpi displays. |
|
We don't really have double-size for any other example plots. |
True - it actually looks kind of bad that we don't do this. All our figures look pretty fuzzy in our docs. |
|
Let's handle that in a separate PR then. |
|
Thanks for the prompt and friendly review! Added some CI and cut a release on PyPI last night: https://pypi.org/project/ridge-map/ |
PR Summary
This adds the
ridge_maplibrary (https://github.com/ColCarroll/ridge_map) to https://matplotlib.org/thirdpartypackages/index.html . I tried to make the example image as small as possible while still looking nice, but it still weighs 286kb. I can try some more tricks if that is too big!Also no problem if this is a bad fit -- the other mapping libraries in here are very impressive and scientifically useful, while this is closer to an art project (which is important, but different!)