8000 Backport PR #13800 on branch v3.1.x (Doc typos.) by meeseeksmachine · Pull Request #13807 · matplotlib/matplotlib · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Backport PR #13800 on branch v3.1.x (Doc typos.) #13807

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2019
Merged

Backport PR #13800 on branch v3.1.x (Doc typos.) #13807

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions doc/api/api_overview.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Further reading:
The object-oriented API
-----------------------

At its core, Matbplotlib is object-oriented. We recommend directly working
At its core, Matplotlib is object-oriented. We recommend directly working
with the objects, if you need more control and customization of your plots.

In many cases you will create a `.Figure` and one or more
Expand All @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ Further reading:
(except for the pyplot section)
- The list of :doc:`matplotlib modules </api/index>`.


The pylab API (disapproved)
---------------------------

Expand All @@ -51,6 +50,6 @@ The pylab API (disapproved)
instead.

`matplotlib.pylab` is a module that includes `matplotlib.pyplot`, `numpy`
and some additional functions within a single namespace. It's original puropse
and some additional functions within a single namespace. Its original purpose
was to mimic a MATLAB-like way of working by importing all functions into the
global namespace. This is considered bad style nowadays.
0