DOC: Sanitize some internal documentation links #11268
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
timhoffm
approved these changes
May 18, 2018
|
FWIW I much prefer links of the form given in https://matplotlib.org/devdocs/devel/documenting_mpl.html#referring-to-other-documents-and-sections (using :doc: + file instead of sphx_glr): they are both shorter and link to the file itself instead of an internal anchor that's just below the top. |
97ec479 to
2f78a1e
Compare
|
Ok, done. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Summary
At some places in the documentation, links pointed to the online version of the docs instead of the internal version. E.g.
http://matplotlib.org/whateverinstead ofwhatever. This is undesired because the documentation should be self consistent and not accidentally point to a different version which may be available online.This PR fixes those links. (I'm 99% sure, I found them all, but you can't ever be certain ;-))
PR Checklist