8000 Optimize modules for pip package and lazy fetch dependencies by whummer · Pull Request #1455 · localstack/localstack · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Optimize modules for pip package and lazy fetch dependencies #1455 8000

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 3, 2019
Merged

Optimize modules for pip package and lazy fetch dependencies #1455

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 3, 2019

Conversation

whummer
Copy link
Member
@whummer whummer commented Aug 2, 2019

Work in progress: Optimize modules for pip package and lazy fetch dependencies

@whummer whummer force-pushed the feat/thin-install branch 3 times, most recently from 83553d1 to ece978a Compare August 2, 2019 22:56
@whummer whummer force-pushed the feat/thin-install branch 3 times, most recently from 2b4e0bb to c18b9ae Compare August 3, 2019 11:47
@whummer whummer force-pushed the feat/thin-install branch 3 times, most recently from b0dde5c to f66c6ba Compare August 3, 2019 16:19
@whummer whummer force-pushed the feat/thin-install branch from f66c6ba to 0c65f16 Compare August 3, 2019 16:36
@coveralls
Copy link
coveralls commented Aug 3, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 69.225% when pulling 0c65f16 on feat/thin-install into e38eae0 on master.

@whummer whummer merged commit 4fe68f0 into master Aug 3, 2019
@whummer whummer deleted the feat/thin-install branch August 3, 2019 18:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@whummer @coveralls
0