8000 add mesh conformance tests structure and a first test by LiorLieberman · Pull Request #3729 · kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

LiorLieberman
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?
/area conformance-test

What this PR does / why we need it:
#3581 shows that we have minimal conformance tests coverage.
At KubeCon EU, we agreed that its best to first provide coverage and follow up with framework impro 8000 vements later.

Added the first test for path rewrite, and tested with istio

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related: #3581

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Add mesh conformance test for HTTPPathRewrite

/cc @youngnick @robscott @mikemorris

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from mikemorris April 5, 2025 16:31
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Apr 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 5, 2025
@LiorLieberman LiorLieberman force-pushed the mesh-conformance-tests branch from 7a263b4 to 4c5db2f Compare April 5, 2025 16:36
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 5, 2025
@LiorLieberman LiorLieberman force-pushed the mesh-conformance-tests branch from 4c5db2f to 097443b Compare April 7, 2025 06:44
@LiorLieberman LiorLieberman force-pushed the mesh-conformance-tests branch from 097443b to 397e794 Compare April 18, 2025 13:03
@LiorLieberman LiorLieberman force-pushed the mesh-conformance-tests branch from 8c0825c to bfaf5ff Compare April 18, 2025 13:32
Copy link
Contributor
@kflynn kflynn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With the understanding that this isn't the final end state we want, I think we're good to go ahead and land this one as a stopgap so that we can have some mesh conformance coverage. Thanks, @LiorLieberman!

@kflynn
Copy link
Contributor
kflynn commented Apr 24, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2025
@robscott
Copy link
Member

Thanks @LiorLieberman!

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kflynn, LiorLieberman, robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request proces 8000 s is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1e14dd6 into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 24, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants
0