8000 Amendment to PR 270 (issue #262) by mccullya · Pull Request #299 · kubernetes-client/python · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Amendment to PR 270 (issue #262) #299

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2017
Merged

Conversation

mccullya
Copy link
Contributor

The issue surround #262 which was fixed in version 0.43 of websocket-client, has been reintroduced in version 0.44.0

This PR updates the requirements so websocket-client will go no further than 0.40.0

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/wiki/CLA-FAQ to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 19, 2017
requirements.txt Outdated
@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ urllib3>=1.19.1,!=1.21 # MIT
pyyaml>=3.12 # MIT
google-auth>=1.0.1 # Apache-2.0
ipaddress>=1.0.17 # PSF
websocket-client>=0.32.0 # LGPLv2+
websocket-client<=0.40.0 # LGPLv2+
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

>=0.32.0,<=0.40.0?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, yes, that makes sense....

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 20, 2017
@mbohlool
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. @jonastl does this look good?

@mbohlool mbohlool merged commit bca588f into kubernetes-client:master Jul 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0