Skip inverse deletion if is a hasMany type. #376
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Skipping deletion only half-fixes the problem. In this case relations will have records that are already deleted. The proper solution would be to go through related items and to remove those that were deleted. |
|
Thanks for opening this. I took a closer look at JSData's code, and found that the unlinking functionality had a bug. I've fixed it, and used the code in your plunker to create a test to verify the fix. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the inverted relationship of a is a hasMany, it will unset it during the removal of a record that is within the set. See http://plnkr.co/edit/6KenzTlIliOTZuSxuBBp?p=preview for an example.