8000 Clarify hardware needs for flexit_bacnet by lellky · Pull Request #37348 · home-assistant/home-assistant.io · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content
8000

Clarify hardware needs for flexit_bacnet #37348

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

Clarify hardware needs for flexit_bacnet #37348

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

lellky
Copy link
Contributor
@lellky lellky commented Feb 7, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Proposed change

This change clarifies the need for extra hardware for the flexit_bacnet integration.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced the integration guide for Flexit Nordic series units by specifying the requirement for an ethernet port and clarifying that communication occurs via the BACnet protocol over Ethernet.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the current This PR goes into the current branch label Feb 7, 2025
@netlify Netlify
Copy link
netlify bot commented Feb 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit af52210
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/67a61c6c4f0a7d00087eaffe
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-37348--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update introduces additional prerequisites for the integration of the Flexit Nordic series air handling unit into Home Assistant. A new line has been added to clarify that the Flexit device must be equipped with an ethernet port and that the integration communicates using the BACnet protocol over Ethernet. The overall structure and content of the integration documentation remain unchanged, with no deletions or modifications to existing sections.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/flexit_bacnet.markdown Added a line clarifying the need for an ethernet port and specifying BACnet over Ethernet usage.

Sequence Diagram(s)

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c87961 and af52210.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/flexit_bacnet.markdown (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • source/_integrations/flexit_bacnet.markdown
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution 8000 in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Feb 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/flexit_bacnet.markdown (1)

26-27: Fix Typographical Error and Consistency.
The word "prootocol" in line 27 is a typographical error; it should be "protocol". Additionally, consider capitalizing "Ethernet" for consistency with industry standards.

Proposed change:

- i.e. this integration communicates with the prootocol BACnet over ethernet.
+ i.e. this integration communicates with the BACnet protocol over Ethernet.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4a85fe and 4c87961.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/flexit_bacnet.markdown (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Lint Markdown
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/flexit_bacnet.markdown (1)

26-27: Clear Hardware Prerequisites Added.
The new lines effectively clarify that a Flexit device must have an Ethernet port and that the integration operates using the BACnet protocol over Ethernet. This additional detail directly supports the PR objective of providing clearer hardware requirements for the flexit_bacnet integration.

@lellky lellky force-pushed the flexit_bacnet/clarification branch from 98826ed to 37ea340 Compare February 7, 2025 12:43
frenck
frenck reviewed Feb 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
frenck
frenck approved these changes Feb 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member
@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @lellky 👍

../Frenck

frenck
frenck approved these changes Feb 7, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member
@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @lellky 👍

../Frenck

@frenck frenck merged commit dbd40cb into home-assistant:current Feb 7, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 8, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@frenck frenck frenck approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Extra BACNET module required?
2 participants
@lellky @frenck
0