narrow decorator match to exclude matrix multiplication#47
Closed
jhrmnn wants to merge 2 commits intohdima:masterfrom
Closed
narrow decorator match to exclude matrix multiplication#47jhrmnn wants to merge 2 commits intohdima:masterfrom
jhrmnn wants to merge 2 commits intohdima:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Actually |
Author
|
Agreed, I've updated accordingly. |
lilydjwg
added a commit
to lilydjwg/dotvim
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2016
lilydjwg
added a commit
to lilydjwg/python-syntax
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2016
lilydjwg
added a commit
to vim-python/python-syntax
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2017
Author
|
I believe this repo was abandoned in favor of https://github.com/vim-python/python-syntax |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #46. "@" in decorator definition always has to start a line. "@" as an inflix operator has to be always proceeded with something. This change distinguishes these two cases.