Fixes an issue with splitReadStream #6112
Conversation
All of these methods were handwritten.
The server denies requests without a fractional value set. This change sets a semi-sensible default. In the future we should remove this method and force users to use the one with a request message since users should know what fraction they want to split at (i.e., 0.5 is not always a good choice).
|
Thanks for submitting this. The comments mean that this entire file is managed by a code generator, so any hand-written updates will be overwritten. We will need to address this upstream in our generator and/or service definitions. Can you open an issue here to reference and we will look into how to best make the changes upstream? |
|
I was told my @mmladenovski that this file was written by hand, which is why I removed the comments. How is this file generated? |
@aryann , the file was added with #4022 . @kmjung , might provide more details. I think it was copied from the auto-generated BaseBigQueryStorageClient and then modified to use the Enhanced stub along with the ResumptionStrategy. Currently the file is manually maintained. The comments related to auto-generation should be removed. |
| SplitReadStreamRequest.newBuilder().setOriginalStream(originalStream).build(); | ||
| SplitReadStreamRequest.newBuilder() | ||
| .setOriginalStream(originalStream) | ||
| .setFraction(0.5f) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would suggest to move the 0.5f value to a constant STREAM_SPLIT_FRACTION and use it in all places!
|
The BigQuery Storage client for Java now lives here: https://github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage and has recently been re-generated. The comments re: auto-generation are still present because this is an autogenerated library, but if you see other issues (the file referenced from v1beta1 is here: https://github.com/googleapis/java-bigquerystorage/blob/master/google-cloud-bigquerystorage/src/main/java/com/google/cloud/bigquery/storage/v1beta1/BigQueryStorageClient.java) please file an issue in that repo. I'm going to go ahead and close this. cc: @stephaniewang526 as an FYI and in case you want to do something different with this issue. :) |
The method requires a fraction, which is not provided in this client.
Additionally, I'm removing some comments that don't make sense.