8000 fix: Fix error when query job destination is None by na0fu3y · Pull Request #3127 · google/adk-python · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

na0fu3y
Copy link
@na0fu3y na0fu3y commented Oct 9, 2025

What this PR does

This PR fixes a bug in the execute_sql function within bigquery/query_tool.py. The bug caused an error when executing queries that do not return a result set, such as a CREATE TEMP FUNCTION statement.

The problem

Within execute_sql, when a user executed a query that doesn't produce a result set, like the following:

CREATE TEMP FUNCTION f() AS (0); SELECT f();

The corresponding BigQuery job object would have its destination property set to None. This caused an error because the code was written with the expectation of a valid destination table.

The solution

The fix modifies execute_sql to check if the query_job.destination is None. If it is, the function correctly identifies the query as a statement that doesn't require a destination and allows it to complete successfully.

This ensures that execute_sql can robustly handle these types of queries.

Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @na0fu3y, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request fixes an error in the execute_sql function by introducing a null check for the query_job.destination property. Previously, queries that did not produce a result set would cause an AttributeError because the code attempted to access dataset_id on a None destination object. The change ensures that such queries are handled gracefully, allowing them to complete successfully without error.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: This PR addresses a bug in the execute_sql function within bigquery/query_tool.py that caused errors when executing BigQuery statements (e.g., CREATE TEMP FUNCTION) that do not return a result set, as these queries result in a None destination property for the BigQuery job.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

Thank you for this contribution. The fix is correct and addresses the bug described. I've added one suggestion to simplify the implementation for better readability and maintainability.

Comment on lines +197 to 205
destination_dataset_id = None
if dry_run_query_job.destination:
destination_dataset_id = dry_run_query_job.destination.dataset_id

if (
dry_run_query_job.statement_type != "SELECT"
and dry_run_query_job.destination.dataset_id != bq_session_dataset_id
and destination_dataset_id != bq_session_dataset_id
and destination_dataset_id is not None
):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the current implementation correctly fixes the bug, it can be simplified for better readability and conciseness. By leveraging Python's short-circuiting behavior with and, you can perform the check for dry_run_query_job.destination and access its dataset_id within the same conditional expression. This avoids creating a temporary variable and makes the logic more direct.

      if (
          dry_run_query_job.statement_type != "SELECT"
          and dry_run_query_job.destination
          and dry_run_query_job.destination.dataset_id != bq_session_dataset_id
      ):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

0