8000 Provide `no-redundant-roles` exception for `rowgroup` by khiga8 · Pull Request #531 · github/eslint-plugin-github · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Provide no-redundant-roles exception for rowgroup #531

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

Provide no-redundant-roles exception for rowgroup #531

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions lib/configs/react.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,5 +42,13 @@ module.exports = {
fieldset: ['radiogroup', 'presentation'],
},
],
'jsx-a11y/no-redundant-roles': [
'error',
{
nav: ['navigation'], // default in eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, is this needed because the object is overridden when we provide our own config/mapping? 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that is correct!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or at least thats how I remember it.. let me double check 👀

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I'm interpreting the logic correctly, it looks like the rule will use the default { nav: ['navigation']} if the consumer isn't already passing an alternate option! This seems fine to keep!

tbody: ['rowgroup'],
thead: ['rowgroup'],
},
],
},
}
0