Refactoring Database Code #66
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ged return order of set_if_unchanged(); Updated test cases
bjornick
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
_http_client). Right now onlydbmodule is using it. In the future_user_mgtcan also use the same.get_if_changed()andset_if_unchanged()methods.Note: While testing this I also uncovered what looks like a bug in the REST API (A 304 response to a conditional read, leaves the HTTP connection in an inconsistent state). I have made a comment about this in the corresponding integration test, and temporarily disabled it. I'm working with the REST API team on a separate thread to get it resolved.
This is a follow up to #59