Better logic for returning the hook object from method call#706
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 25, 2017
daffl
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2017
Better logic for returning the hook object from method call
daffl
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2017
Better logic for returning the hook object from method call
daffl
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2017
Better logic for returning the hook object from method call
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In some cases - specifically for the service providers - we want to allow to return the hook object instead of only the result from a method call. This used to be possible by setting
params.__returnHookbut it is too easy to blowparamsaway in a hook chain.This new way returns the hook object if the last parameter in a service call is
true.