8000 ➖ Do not require backports in Python >= 3.7 by FFY00 · Pull Request #1880 · fastapi/fastapi · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

@FFY00
Copy link
Contributor
@FFY00 FFY00 commented Aug 12, 2020

Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns lains@archlinux.org

Signed-off-by: Filipe Laíns <lains@archlinux.org>
@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1880 (0793a53) into master (5607c19) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #1880   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          410       410           
  Lines        10281     10281           
=========================================
  Hits         10281     10281           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5607c19...0793a53. Read the comment docs.

@FFY00
Copy link
Contributor Author
FFY00 commented Aug 12, 2020

This should avoid some extra package installation for some users, as well as act as a reminder to remove the dependency and code when you move to Python 3.7 as the minimum version 😊

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

📝 Docs preview for commit 8cbba98 at: https://5f33ea6535aa1947e18c28e6--fastapi.netlify.app

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor
github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2021

📝 Docs preview for commit 0793a53 at: https://615c130f97b64ad8481adb06--fastapi.netlify.app

@tiangolo tiangolo changed the title pyproject: skip Python 3.7 backport requirements on Python >= 3.7 ➖ Do not require backports in Python >= 3.7 Oct 5, 2021
@tiangolo
Copy link
Member
tiangolo commented Oct 5, 2021

Awesome, thanks @FFY00! 🚀

This is included in FastAPI 0.68.3, just released. 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

0