E525 Replace WB (Compound)Command classes with downstream GEF implementation by ptziegler · Pull Request #606 · eclipse-windowbuilder/windowbuilder · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Replace WB (Compound)Command classes with downstream GEF implementation#606

Merged
ptziegler merged 1 commit intoeclipse-windowbuilder:masterfrom
ptziegler:gef-commands
Oct 22, 2023
Merged

Replace WB (Compound)Command classes with downstream GEF implementation#606
ptziegler merged 1 commit intoeclipse-windowbuilder:masterfrom
ptziegler:gef-commands

Conversation

@ptziegler
Copy link
Contributor

Those classes are almost identical, with the only difference being that execute() doesn't throw an exception. Given that we don't rely on this functionality, it's effectively a drop-in replacement.

Part of the ongoing process to synchronize our graphical editor with GEF.

@ptziegler ptziegler added this to the 1.14.0 milestone Oct 21, 2023
@ptziegler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that 95% of this change just consists of shuffling the imports around... Both our commands and the GEF commands are effectively identical.

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented Oct 21, 2023

Unit Test Results

         2 files           2 suites   1h 9m 16s ⏱️
  7 650 tests   7 447 ✔️ 203 💤 0
15 300 runs  14 894 ✔️ 406 💤 0

Results for commit ae2ced2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Those classes are almost identical, with the only difference being that
execute() doesn't throw an exception. Given that we don't rely on this
functionality, it's effectively a drop-in replacement.

Part of the ongoing process to synchronize our graphical editor with
GEF.
@ptziegler ptziegler merged commit b79a02f into eclipse-windowbuilder:master Oct 22, 2023
@ptziegler ptziegler deleted the gef-commands branch October 22, 2023 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

0