-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 943
refactor: redesign workspace status on workspaces table #17425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8212659
refactor: redesign workspace status on workspces table
BrunoQuaresma 43685a6
FMT
BrunoQuaresma c693ebf
Fix storybook
BrunoQuaresma f1f43d0
Apply PR comments
BrunoQuaresma 4bdb3aa
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/coder/coder into bq/refacto…
BrunoQuaresma bbe9d8f
Fix merging conflict
BrunoQuaresma 236f9dd
Merge branch 'main' into bq/refactor-status-column
BrunoQuaresma File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Apply PR comments
- Loading branch information
commit f1f43d03a86c90eeeb28a0c17ab5a02c2505bfe9
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wondering if it's worth splitting off the
variant
property into a separate type, and exporting that instead. Chaining props like this feels like fragile, over-coupled dependenciesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this makes sense when the defined type is dependent on the another one. So, if I change the props on
StatusIndicator
it will be reflect onvariantByStatusType
without any extra effort. Besides that, I think having something like:It just works as an alias IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Putting more thoughts on it, I just think types dependency may warn us about components being too coupled, which is not always bad, but definitely something to evaluate.