refactor(feature_flags): use standard collections for type #6489
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 tasks
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #6489 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 96.33% 96.33%
========================================
Files 243 243
Lines 11833 11833
Branches 881 881
========================================
Hits 11399 11399
Misses 338 338
Partials 96 96 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
anafalcao
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2025
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue number: #6488
Summary
Changes
PEP 585 recommends using collections for type hints instead of their typing counterparts.
User experience
no changes
Checklist
If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.
Is this a breaking change?
RFC issue number:
Checklist:
Acknowledgment
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.
Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.