8000 Make async registry data structure generic by jvolmer · Pull Request #21699 · arangodb/arangodb · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Make async registry data structure generic #21699

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jvolmer
Copy link
Contributor
@jvolmer jvolmer commented Apr 2, 2025

We want to use the async registry data structure for the task registry as well, therefore this PR extracts the data structure (both Registry and ThreadRegistry) into generic types ListOfNonOwnedLists and ThreadOwnedList.
The async registry now works with these generic types.

Tests for both new data structures are added. The old RegistryTest is now adapted such that it really tests now the global registry and its usage.

@jvolmer jvolmer self-assigned this Apr 2, 2025
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Apr 2, 2025
@jvolmer jvolmer force-pushed the feature/generic-async-registry branch 3 times, most recently from f436471 to a171111 Compare April 3, 2025 05:06
@jvolmer jvolmer force-pushed the feature/generic-async-registry branch from 3d7b797 to ca11898 Compare April 14, 2025 11:31
Copy link
Contributor
@jbajic jbajic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left just a few small comments. LGTM!

@goedderz goedderz merged commit df27a1c into devel Apr 28, 2025
7 checks passed
@goedderz goedderz deleted the feature/generic-async-registry branch April 28, 2025 07:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0