8000
We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Affected feature: AQL query result differs between 3.4.0 and 3.3.20 (and lower?)
AQL query (if applicable):
FOR v IN [] COLLECT collection=PARSE_IDENTIFIER(v._id) INTO grp=v RETURN {collection: collection,grp: grp}
Problem:
The result for the same query executed on different version of ArangoDB Server differs.
V 3.3.20 returns:
[]
V 3.4 returns:
[ { "collection": "(non-representable type)", "grp": [] } ]
Expected result:
ArangoDB V 3.4 should return an empty array too (like V 3.3.20 does). The changed query result breaks the logic in my project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I experienced the same behavior in all my queries.
Sorry, something went wrong.
issue #7749
847de4c
fixed issue #7749
4b91d5b
issue #7749 (#7794)
93d624d
fixed issue #7749 (#7797)
b5e844f
Fixed in 3.4.1.
Hi @CBlinguland,
version 3.4.1, which includes a fix for this issue, has been released.
Could you please give it a try?
Hi @maxkernbach,
your fix in version 3.4.1 (windows and linux) solved the problem for me. Thanks for fixing this...
jsteemann
No branches or pull requests
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
My Environment
Component, Query & Data
Affected feature:
AQL query result differs between 3.4.0 and 3.3.20 (and lower?)
AQL query (if applicable):
Steps to reproduce
Problem:
The result for the same query executed on different version of ArangoDB Server differs.
V 3.3.20 returns:
V 3.4 returns:
Expected result:
ArangoDB V 3.4 should return an empty array too (like V 3.3.20 does).
The changed query result breaks the logic in my project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: