8000 Update Exceptions by ItzNotABug · Pull Request #9728 · appwrite/appwrite · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Update Exceptions #9728

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
ItzNotABug merged 7 commits into from
May 7, 2025
Merged

Update Exceptions #9728

ItzNotABug merged 7 commits into from
May 7, 2025

Conversation

@ItzNotABug
Copy link
Member
@ItzNotABug ItzNotABug commented May 6, 2025

What does this PR do?

(Provide a description of what this PR does and why it's needed.)

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. Screenshots may also be helpful.)

Related PRs and Issues

  • (Related PR or issue)

Checklist

  • Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
  • If the PR includes a change to an API's metadata (desc, label, params, etc.), does it also include updated API specs and example docs?

@ItzNotABug ItzNotABug requested a review from abnegate May 6, 2025 11:33
@ItzNotABug ItzNotABug self-assigned this May 6, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented May 6, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (3)
  • main
  • 1.6.x
  • 1.7.x

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented May 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Security Scan Results for PR

Docker Image Scan Results

Package Version Vulnerability Severity
binutils 2.42-r0 CVE-2025-0840 HIGH
libexpat 2.6.4-r0 CVE-2024-8176 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2024-56171 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-24928 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-27113 HIGH
sqlite-libs 3.45.3-r1 CVE-2025-29087 HIGH
xz 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
xz-libs 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 CVE-2025-22869 HIGH

Source Code Scan Results

🎉 No vulnerabilities found!

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented May 6, 2025

✨ Benchmark results

  • Requests per second: 1,014
  • Requests with 200 status code: 182,609
  • P99 latency: 0.182745065

⚡ Benchmark Comparison

Metric This PR Latest version
RPS 1,014 1,360
200 182,609 244,847
P99 0.182745065 0.133771732

@ItzNotABug
Copy link
Member Author
ItzNotABug commented May 6, 2025

@abnegate do we want to make these backwards compatible with 1.6? cc @Meldiron mentioned a use-case around it.

Base automatically changed from events-compatibility to response-filters-for-databases May 7, 2025 05:04
@ItzNotABug ItzNotABug merged commit 28a74e6 into response-filters-for-databases May 7, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@ItzNotABug ItzNotABug deleted the update-exceptions branch May 7, 2025 06:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@abnegate abnegate Awaiting requested review from abnegate

Assignees

@ItzNotABug ItzNotABug

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ItzNotABug
0