8000 Bump migrations by ItzNotABug · Pull Request #10160 · appwrite/appwrite · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

@ItzNotABug
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

(Provide a description of what this PR does and why it's needed.)

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. Screenshots may also be helpful.)

Related PRs and Issues

  • (Related PR or issue)

Checklist

  • Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
  • If the PR includes a change to an API's metadata (desc, label, params, etc.), does it also include updated API specs and example docs?

@ItzNotABug ItzNotABug self-assigned this Jul 18, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Jul 18, 2025
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This set of changes updates terminology and internal logic throughout the codebase to shift from "collections/documents/attributes" to "tables/rows/columns" in the context of database migrations and related API endpoints. Logging keys and migration report models are updated to reflect this new terminology. The test suite for migrations is comprehensively refactored to use the updated terms and endpoints, including renaming methods and adjusting assertions. Additionally, the code handling document permissions during upsert operations now ensures the permissions field is always an array, defaulting to an empty array if null. The migration package dependency is also updated to a newer version. Additional test coverage was added to verify upsert operations without explicit permissions and subsequent row access and deletion.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6ec18b and 5b60eb8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Databases/Http/Databases/Collections/Documents/Upsert.php (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Databases/Http/Databases/Collections/Documents/Upsert.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: E2E General Test
  • GitHub Check: scan
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented Jul 18, 2025

Security Scan Results for PR

Docker Image Scan Results

Package Version Vulnerability Severity
binutils 2.42-r0 CVE-2025-0840 HIGH
git 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48384 HIGH
git 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48385 HIGH
git-init-template 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48384 HIGH
git-init-template 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48385 HIGH
icu 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-data-en 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-dev 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-libs 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
libexpat 2.6.4-r0 CVE-2024-8176 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2024-56171 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-24928 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-27113 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32414 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32415 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
sqlite-libs 3.45.3-r1 CVE-2025-29087 HIGH
xz 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
xz-libs 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 CVE-2025-22869 HIGH

Source Code Scan Results

🎉 No vulnerabilities found!

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented Jul 18, 2025

✨ Benchmark results

  • Requests per second: 969
  • Requests with 200 status code: 174,528
  • P99 latency: 0.190097649

⚡ Benchmark Comparison

Metric This PR Latest version
RPS 969 1,016
200 174,528 183,005
P99 0.190097649 0.187972116

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/e2e/Services/Databases/Tables/DatabasesBase.php (1)

2011-2015: Verify row really vanished after DELETE

After the 204 response it’s worth asserting a follow-up GET (or list) returns 404 / not-found.
Helps catch cases where the worker failed to cascade the deletion but still returned 204.

$get = $this->client->call(
    Client::METHOD_GET,
    "/databases/$databaseId/tables/{$data['moviesId']}/rows/$rowId",
    ['content-type' => 'application/json','x-appwrite-project' => $this->getProject()['$id'],'x-appwrite-key' => $this->getProject()['apiKey']]
);
$this->assertEquals(404, $get['headers']['status-code']);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a44f6b and d6ec18b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/e2e/Services/Databases/Tables/DatabasesBase.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9661
File: docs/references/migrations/migration-csv.md:1-1
Timestamp: 2025-04-17T08:08:59.449Z
Learning: Documentation files in docs/references/migrations/ follow a minimalist pattern with 1-2 sentences describing the endpoint's functionality, without including detailed API specifications like HTTP methods, parameters, headers, or examples.
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9693
File: src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Databases/Http/Databases/Tables/Update.php:57-59
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T09:20:03.312Z
Learning: In table-related endpoints (such as `src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Databases/Http/Databases/Tables/Update.php`), parameter descriptions should use "table" and "row" terminology instead of "collection" and "document" for clarity and consistency.
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9693
File: src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Databases/Http/Databases/Tables/Indexes/Delete.php:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-06-25T06:25:45.054Z
Learning: In Appwrite's database module, the event label for deleting a table index intentionally uses 'update' (e.g., 'databases.[databaseId].tables.[tableId].indexes.[indexId].update') instead of 'delete', to match legacy behavior as seen in previous controller implementations.
tests/e2e/Services/Databases/Tables/DatabasesBase.php (1)

undefined

<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: #9693
File: src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Databases/Http/Databases/Tables/Update.php:57-59
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T09:20:03.312Z
Learning: In table-related endpoints (such as src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Databases/Http/Databases/Tables/Update.php), parameter descriptions should use "table" and "row" terminology instead of "collection" and "document" for clarity and consistency.
</retrieved_learning>

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (20)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Messaging)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Migrations)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Webhooks)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Storage)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Projects)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Locale)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Avatars)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Realtime)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Proxy)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Functions)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (GraphQL)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Health)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Console)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Databases/Tables)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Site Screenshots)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Databases/Legacy)
  • GitHub Check: E2E Service Test (Dev Keys)
  • GitHub Check: Unit Test
  • GitHub Check: E2E General Test
  • GitHub Check: scan

Co-authored-by: Jake Barnby <jakeb994@gmail.com>
@abnegate abnegate merged commit 6861a7b into 1.8.x Jul 18, 2025
41 checks passed
@abnegate abnegate deleted the bump-migrations branch July 18, 2025 07:35
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 21, 2025
2 tasks
This was referenced Aug 18, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2025
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

0