fix some codes that violates the C++ One Definition Rule [-Wodr] #2161
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yanglimingcn
pushed a commit
to yanglimingcn/brpc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2023
yanglimingcn
pushed a commit
to yanglimingcn/brpc
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:
Fix some codes that violates the C++ One Definition Rule, which stop us to enable LTO feature
What is changed and the side effects?
Changed:
Side effects:
none
none