-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
Test with Ruby 3.0 and Ruby 3.1 #7275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👍 I'll switch to strings. Not sure about Rails support, I guess not, I will make sure and whatever not supported. |
e0e40cb
to
e8100cb
Compare
affee27
to
9e97359
Compare
Bumps [rails-i18n](https://github.com/svenfuchs/rails-i18n) from 7.0.0 to 7.0.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/svenfuchs/rails-i18n/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/svenfuchs/rails-i18n/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/svenfuchs/rails-i18n/commits) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: rails-i18n dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Geremia Taglialatela <tagliala.dev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Geremia Taglialatela <tagliala.dev@gmail.com>
Only on Rails 6.0 and 6.1 since Rails 5.2 does not work with it. Co-authored-by: Geremia Taglialatela <tagliala.dev@gmail.com>
To fix did_you_mean warnings on Ruby 3.1.
Since net-smtp is not a default gem anymore, the mail gem needs to add it explicitly as a dependency given that it depends on it, in order to support Ruby 3.1. Until that happens, we can workaround the issue by adding the dependency to our gemfiles.
To use less I18n internals and don't print warnings.
It only seems compatible with Rails 6.1. Rails 6.0 would need Psych 4 support backported. Run lint job also with Ruby 3.1, which involves using Rails 6.1 instead of Rails 6.0 given the above.
9e97359
to
4b3125f
Compare
This one should be ready from my side! I want to drop support for Rails 5.2 and Rails 6.0, but I guess that can be done/discussed separately. Also I'm slimming down our CI matrix a bit by running webpacker and turbo links checks only against the latest supported Ruby, so we need to reconfigure our default branch settings to remove some required checks now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All sounds good to me on the Rails support side. Thanks David! ❤️
Try to slowly get back to helping out here.
I want to get Ruby 3.0 and Ruby 3.1 officially tested.
Some changes are also proposed separately at #7235 so I added @tagliala as a co-author.