Switch Python generation from macOS 10.15 to 11 #205
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mikhailkoliada
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2022
marko-zivic-93
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2022
Co-authored-by: Marko Zivic <100996310+marko-zivic-93@users.noreply.github.com>
IvanZosimov
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2022
dmitry-shibanov
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2022
e-korolevskii
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The macOS 10.15 Actions runner image will be deprecated on 12/1/22 for GitHub and ADO. See related announcement. In scope of this PR we switched Python generation from macOS 10.15 to 11.
Here is a list of successful test builds:
We also fixed 2 bugs:
universal2Python versions, so previously created symlinks are not removed as well. This leads to errors if we try to install a Python version with the samemajor.minorversion. It was fixed by additionalifstatement.Related issue: 4233