Remove literal_adjoint(::NoTimeSolution)
#997
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks like this causes an issue downstream https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBase.jl/actions/runs/14635476112/job/41065584762?pr=997#step:6:1719 |
|
One of them inside |
1 similar comment
|
One of them inside |
5 tasks
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
to SciML/DiffEqBase.jl
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2025
SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl#1189 highlights that the downstream tests that are failing for SciMLSensitivity.jl are actually Enzyme issues with v1.11. These are now being tracked here EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl#2318 for the Enzyme developers to work on. But there are certain things we've been weary about, like: * SciML/SciMLBase.jl#997 * SciML/SciMLBase.jl#998 Because of failing downstream tests. But that's counter productive: we're not improving our autodiff interfaces because we see failures, but those aren't failures of our autodiff interfaces, those are Enzyme failures. So for now the solution seems to be to go to v1.10 in these downstream tests and increase the coverage of SciMLSensitivity, and focus on our parts. We can re-enable "1" when Enzyme is ready for it, but for now it's just noise.
ChrisRackauckas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2025
SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl#1189 highlights that the downstream tests that are failing for SciMLSensitivity.jl are actually Enzyme issues with v1.11. These are now being tracked here EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl#2318 for the Enzyme developers to work on. But there are certain things we've been weary about, like: * #997 * #998 Because of failing downstream tests. But that's counter productive: we're not improving our autodiff interfaces because we see failures, but those aren't failures of our autodiff interfaces, those are Enzyme failures. So for now the solution seems to be to go to v1.10 in these downstream tests and increase the coverage of SciMLSensitivity, and focus on our parts. We can re-enable "1" when Enzyme is ready for it, but for now it's just noise.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Solves https://github.com/SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl/actions/runs/14630001687/job/41063831799?pr=1168
Add any other context about the problem here.