8000 Improve package management acceptance tests by not going to the gallery by JamesWTruher · Pull Request #19412 · PowerShell/PowerShell · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Improve package management acceptance tests by not going to the gallery #19412

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 27, 2023
Merged

Improve package management acceptance tests by not going to the gallery #19412

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 27, 2023

Conversation

JamesWTruher
Copy link
Collaborator

PR Summary

The PowerShell gallery is sometimes unavailable which causes our tests to fail. As the package management tests are in a different repo, this is really about acceptance of that package. We can avoid stability problems by making the tests local only.

There is one test which is marked as pending. This is the PackageProvider test which has eluded being able to be local with a test module. That would be addressed at a later date.

PR Context

PR Checklist

@ghost ghost assigned anmenaga Mar 27, 2023
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link

This PR has 60 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

Quantification details 

Label      : Small
Size       : +36 -24
Percentile : 24%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.ps1 : +36 -24

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan merged commit 7ee2206 into PowerShell:master Mar 27, 2023
@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan added Backport-7.2.x-Consider CL-Test Indicates that a PR should be marked as a test change in the Change Log labels Mar 27, 2023
CarloToso pushed a commit to CarloToso/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2023
@stevenebutler
Pr/19379 (#1)
1a6707d 
* Remove FormObject.cs and FormObjectCollection.cs (PowerShell#19383)

* Exclude redundant parameter aliases from completion results (PowerShell#19382)

* Revert "Remove FormObject.cs and FormObjectCollection.cs (PowerShell#19383)" (PowerShell#19387)

This reverts commit 190c99a.

* Add the parameter `-RelativeBasePath` to `Resolve-Path` (PowerShell#19358)

* Fix a crash in the type inference code (PowerShell#19400)

* Remove GetResponseObject (PowerShell#19380)

* Add `-Environment` parameter to `Start-Process` (PowerShell#19374)

* Add `-Environment` parameter to `Start-Process`

* address codefactor

* fix test for Windows

* handle case where value is $null to remove env var

* change variables to make it more clear what the test is doing

* Add PoolNames variable group to compliance pipeline (PowerShell#19408)

* Improve package management acceptance tests by not going to the gallery (PowerShell#19412)

* Skip VT100 tests on Windows Server 2012R2 as console does not support it (PowerShell#19413)

* Update the `ICommandPredictor` interface to reduce boilerplate code from predictor implementation (PowerShell#19414)

* Enable type conversion of `AutomationNull` to `$null` for assignment (PowerShell#19415)

* Remove code related to `#requires -pssnapin` (PowerShell#19320)

* Support CTRL-C when reading data and connection hangs for `Invoke-RestMethod` and `Invoke-WebRequest` (PowerShell#19330)

* Update to the latest NOTICES file (PowerShell#19332)

* Update the cgmanifest (PowerShell#19459)

* WIP: Harden default command test. (PowerShell#19416)
daxian-dbw pushed a commit to daxian-dbw/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2023
@JamesWTruher @daxian-dbw
Improve package management acceptance tests by not going to the galle…
9fc8642 
…ry (PowerShell#19412)
@ghost
Copy link
ghost commented Apr 13, 2023

🎉v7.2.11 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

@ghost
Copy link
ghost commented Apr 13, 2023

🎉v7.3.4 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

@ghost
Copy link
ghost commented Apr 20, 2023

🎉v7.4.0-preview.3 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

adityapatwardhan pushed a commit to adityapatwardhan/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2023
@JamesWTruher @daxian-dbw
Improve package management acceptance tests by not going to the galle…
0c52638 
…ry (PowerShell#19412)
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2024
Closed
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan approved these changes

Assignees

@anmenaga anmenaga

Labels
Backport-7.2.x-Done Backport-7.3.x-Done CL-Test Indicates that a PR should be marked as a test change in the Change Log Small
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@JamesWTruher @adityapatwardhan @daxian-dbw @anmenaga
0