8000 Revert "change nullable usage" as we need to know if it has a value by adityapatwardhan · Pull Request #15980 · PowerShell/PowerShell · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Revert "change nullable usage" as we need to know if it has a value #15980

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2021
Merged

Revert "change nullable usage" as we need to know if it has a value #15980

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2021

Conversation

adityapatwardhan
Copy link
Member

Reverts #13849

@ghost ghost assigned rjmholt Aug 23, 2021
@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw merged commit ab5e177 into master Aug 24, 2021
@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw deleted the revert-13849-fix-ExternalScriptInfo branch August 24, 2021 00:20
xtqqczze pushed a commit to xtqqczze/PowerShell-PowerShell that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
@adityapatwardhan @xtqqczze
Revert "Use GetValueOrDefault() for nullable PSLanguageMode (Powe…
4444053 
…rShell#13849)" (PowerShell#15980)
@adityapatwardhan adityapatwardhan added the CL-NotInBuild Indicates that a PR is reverted and not part of the build. label Sep 28, 2021
TravisEz13 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2021
@adityapatwardhan
Revert "Use GetValueOrDefault() for nullable PSLanguageMode (#13849…
d3465ab 
…)" (#15980)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@daxian-dbw daxian-dbw daxian-dbw approved these changes

@rjmholt rjmholt rjmholt approved these changes

Assignees

@rjmholt rjmholt

Labels
CL-NotInBuild Indicates that a PR is reverted and not part of the build.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@adityapatwardhan @daxian-dbw @rjmholt
0